Parity - Week 18 Highlights

Playoffs!

Things happened this week. Did you see the things that happened? I did. Some of them, anyway.

Owen Lumley Did Things: Owen got handblocked by Andrew Cameron, but threw a no look behind the back backhand for a point. Owen played three games fueled entirely by Timbits (thanks Sandra). Owen fell over trying to throw a frisbee one time. Owen got beaten to a disk by Mel Jess not once, but twice. But for Jessie, Owen led the league in throw aways.

I don't know what to call all of the above other than noteable and hilarious.

Catch Your D's: Bush dropped a Callahan. For reference, people, when you are trying to D a disk and the disk is within your reach, you should attempt to close your hand or hands over the disk to catch it. This prevents the disk from macking up into the air for a second attempt on the catch, and can also score you Callahans.

I Forgot how to Play Frisbee, Wait, No I Didn't: Amos has been lazy all year and finally decided to try in the playoff games, surprising no one, but making life hard on the coordinators that try to balance the league around player salaries. 3G, 8A, 2AA, and 5D's. There is a special circle in hell reserved for sandbaggers, or so I've read (thanks, Dante).

Up And Comer: Remember that time I said watch out for Kris Bergmann? He had 6 goals last night.

The Inverse of Ian: Speaking of people who consistently do not drop the disk in the endzone, Nina Ramic (6G, 1A, 1D), Kevin Hughes (6G, 2A, 3D) and Jim Robinson (6G, 1A, 2D) also scored 6 times.

Ian avoided the endzone (correctly) and threw 9 assists. That's just smrt. Way to look at the game tape from last week and change up your systems. This single week may earn you the Bill Bellichick award.

Mimicry is the Purest Form of Flatter:  I'll also call this the "rhyme biting award." Three people attempted to throw around a light for a point, as people continue to ape Justine's notable play from early in the year. Al failed... Tim Kealey and (I think) Nick Theriault succeeded.

All You Need is Steve: Kindha's team had a pretty bad game. The only thing they were missing? Steve Close (née Owen Lumley Jr.) and Steve Bisang. Ian's team won in resounding fashion (+19) over Kindha. The only difference in his roster? Steve Chow showed up.

The trick to Parity is to draft all Steve's and have them show up, clearly.

YAC (Yards After Contact): Anne Leduc made a great catch and then got bowled over by her defender (who advanced her forward a yard or two). Anne Leduc is Parities greatest slot receiver, apparently. 

Man Down: In more serious, unhappy news, Chris Vickers was hurt last night. He will be done for the season, and I would like us to all wish him the best, as well as a speedy recovery.

3G: pinpoint throws from handlers
8A: receivers willing to risk everything for some imaginary money
2AA: sometimes picking up the disc has its advantages
5D: suddenly people are throwing discs near me as opposed to the rest of the season 

As explained above... laziness is still possible. Don't believe the hype. 

They are filthy and wrong.

I see clearly now that I have a Jason Spezza (circa Ottawa Senators) role on my team to play.  I need to show up, make one or two good plays and then make shitty and questionable plays to inspire the rest of my team do better.

... is that he is (and basically always has been) an elite player who makes lots of good to great plays that are ignored, and a few shitty and questionable ones that everyone remembers instead. It's a sort of anchoring bias.

So the parallels between Spezza and you are clear. The above is why a Bisang is what it is in parity.

so if you trade bisang you get a poor return but your fans "feel" better?

Given last night's performance I think we have no more fans.  After playing three games for a combined score of 81-45 against, it was personally tough to even find solace in the timbits.  In order lift my spirits and create some parity leage excitement, I'll be lobbying for a new stats category and top ten list for lefty-no-look-behind-the-back-assist ("righty" for you lefties).  Who's up to the challenge?

As my team won their playoff game and the games I'm in actually "matter", I'm going to have to pass.

As my team won their playoff game and the games I'm in actually "matter", I'm going to have to (continue to) pass (only, and stay the hell away from the endzone myself).

As my team won their playoff game and the games I'm in actually "matter", I'm going to have to use no look scoobers instead. #sorrystan

 

As long as they are for completions, no need to say sorry.

As my team won their playoff game and our games actually matter i will still try to catch discs with my feet.

oh wait... they didn't.

Crap.

If you're a Steve, and your team has been "eliminated" from the playoffs...why not join my team? I can offer a generous* salary, innumerable** benefits, and the opportunity to play with other Steves in a pro-Steve*** environment. 

Contact me at i.like.steves@gmail.com, or at kindha.probably.hates.me.now@yahoo.ca.

*fake
**in that I can't count any
***i.e., a Steve-positive environment...none of you are "pros"

I lol'd at work, Ian. Well said. 

Keates/Matt, what is the playoff format? It does not appear to be 1 vs. 8 (that would've been Stan vs. Sina last week), 2 vs. 7, etc.

Thanks. 

Given the posts this year, I expect your reply to be witty, pedantic and circumspectly informative. I would also like Ian Ewing to comment for increased entertainment value.

To meet the logistical needs and the league's scheduling requirements for the double header of this week, we went with a double-bracket playoff pool.
 
Bracket A was seeds 1, 3, 5 and 7. Bracket B was seeds 2, 4, 6, and 8. I'll also note, the league and the GM's agreed to have seeding for the playoffs reflect the records of the teams from game 10 onwards, given the redraft that was in the middle of the season. For the curious, the seeding going into the playoffs looked like this:
 
1 Luke Parity 5 1 2
2 Katy Parity 5 3
3 Ignominious 4 2 2*
4 Stan's Sturgeons 4 3 1
5 Karma Down Under 4 3 1*
6 Pirate Rob's Swashbuckling Rogues 3 4 1
7 Scoobers in New York 2 6
8 Moderate Expectations 1 6 1
 
Stars indicate assumed ties, simply for the purposes of seeding, because of the missed game. Stan's Sturgeons is rated above Karma Down Under because 1 earned tie is valued more highly than 1 assumed tie.
 
Beyond that, tie breaks would have been resolved by the following:
 
1. head to head matchup
2. team +/-
3. team points for
4. team salary (lowest - has done the best with the least salary)
5. GM salary (highest - has played the best individually)

I'm not sure this post met Justine's criteria. I mean the video was fun... but Keates, you can do better. 

It worked for me, but there was a trailing " in the link. I've edited it out. Please try again.

Keates, you met and exceeded my moderate expectations for wit and pedantic reply with the video as the final, unexpected smackdown. Chris and I were highly entertained. If only the tie break needed went to #6, if only........

Oh, and thanks for the explanation on the format.